Ripple as 90% XRP? Wall Street’s $500M Safety Net

The latest Bloomberg reporting on Ripple has lit up the XRP community and the wider crypto market.

This was not a typical late-stage tech investment. The investors insisted on a sophisticated “safety net” structure, with protections more common in structured credit than in standard venture rounds. In other words, traditional finance wanted in on Ripple’s upside, but only if they could engineer downside protection against XRP volatility, regulatory uncertainty and the still-maturing digital asset market.

This episode raises important questions. Why did investors still back Ripple if they saw it as a concentrated bet on XRP? How exactly did the safety net work? And what does this mean for XRP price, XRP ETFs, and the long-term future of Ripple’s ecosystem?

In this article, we unpack the Bloomberg story, explore the mechanics of the deal, and look at its implications for Ripple, XRP, and the broader crypto-finance relationship.

The Bloomberg Story in Context

Ripple’s $500M Share Sale and $40B Valuation

Bloomberg’s reporting, summarized by several crypto news outlets, describes a large $500 million share sale by Ripple that valued the company at around $40 billion, placing it among the most highly valued private crypto firms in the world.

Big-name institutional investors took part, including firms linked to Citadel Securities, Fortress Investment Group, Marshall Wace, Brevan Howard, Galaxy Digital and Pantera Capital. These are not retail speculators; they are professional investors with rigorous risk models and deep experience in emerging markets and alternative assets.

For Wall Street to write a $500 million check into Ripple at that valuation, the firm had to be more than just a crypto token story. Yet, at the same time, those investors concluded that Ripple’s net asset value was overwhelmingly tied to XRP — making the investment behave a lot like a large, structured bet on one volatile digital asset.

Ripple Seen as “90% XRP”

Multiple investors reportedly concluded that about 90% of Ripple’s net asset value was effectively XRP exposure, because the company holds vast quantities of the token in its treasury and on locked schedules.

At mid-2025 market prices, Ripple was said to control more than $120 billion worth of XRP at one point, making it one of the largest single corporate treasuries of any cryptocurrency.

Although Ripple is legally distinct from XRP and has long stressed that separation, the economic reality for investors is clear: if XRP crashes, Ripple’s balance sheet and enterprise value will feel the impact. That is why Wall Street saw Ripple as 90% XRP and priced the risk accordingly.

Why Wall Street Still Invested: The XRP Bet with Guardrails

The Appeal of XRP After the SEC Case

The timing of the deal matters. Ripple had emerged from a long-running dispute with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with a landmark court decision clarifying that XRP, when traded on exchanges, is generally not considered a security.

This clarity helped unblock demand from institutional investors, triggered the launch of spot XRP ETFs in the United States, and boosted confidence in XRP’s regulatory status. Inflows into those ETFs have been strong, with products reportedly nearing $1 billion in assets after a sustained streak of net inflows.

For Wall Street, this combination of regulatory clarity and growing ETFs liquidity made XRP a compelling, if risky, blue-chip crypto asset. Investing in Ripple became a way to gain leveraged exposure to XRP upside, but the volatility still demanded protection.

Strategic Position in Cross-Border Payments

Beyond the token, Ripple’s core business in cross-border payments and enterprise blockchain solutions continues to attract banks, fintechs and payment providers. Its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) product uses XRP as a bridge asset for instant global settlements, linking fiat currencies through a tokenized pathway.

This means the investment is not just about speculation; it is also a bet on blockchain-based remittances, institutional adoption of tokenized liquidity, and the long-term shift away from slow, expensive correspondent banking rails.

Inside the Safety Net: How Investors Protected Themselves

Put Option–Like Rights and Guaranteed Return

According to the reporting, investors negotiated the right to sell their Ripple shares back to the company after three or four years, with a guaranteed annualized return, often cited around the 10% level.

This resembles a put option: if the XRP price underperforms or the valuation of Ripple falls, investors can force a buyback of their shares at a price that still delivers them a solid yield. For traditional finance, this is a familiar way to cap downside risk while leaving upside open.

In addition, if Ripple chooses to buy back shares earlier or under certain conditions, investors could earn an even higher annualized return — reportedly up to around 25% in some scenarios.

This structure turns a volatile equity stake in a crypto-native company into something closer to a yielding credit instrument, albeit with equity upside.

Liquidation Preference and Capital Stack Protection

Another key protection is the liquidation preference. In the event of a sale, restructuring or insolvency, these investors are placed ahead of legacy shareholders in the payout waterfall.

This is a classic private equity and venture capital safeguard, but its combination with the structured return features makes the deal more like structured credit than straightforward growth equity, as Bloomberg’s coverage highlighted.

Synthetic Floor Under Investors’ Capital

Taken together, the guaranteed return, put-style rights, and liquidation preference create what analysts have called a “synthetic floor” under the investors’ capital.

What This Means for XRP and the Crypto Market

Validation of XRP as a Core Institutional Asset

One of the strongest signals from this deal is that XRP has moved firmly into the institutional conversation. When multi-billion-dollar funds engineer complex structures around an asset, it means they see:

The fact that Wall Street saw Ripple as 90% XRP, yet still invested heavily, underscores that institutional investors now treat XRP as a major digital asset, comparable to other blue-chip cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, but with a unique payments-driven use case.

A Template for Future Crypto Financings

The deal structure also offers a blueprint for future late-stage crypto financings. Instead of simple equity raises, we may see more:

For large funds that must control risk, this type of risk-engineered exposure to tokens and token-rich companies could become standard practice. That, in turn, can accelerate the flow of traditional capital into the crypto ecosystem, without forcing investors to compromise on risk controls.

Impact on XRP Price Dynamics

In the short term, the news came during a period when XRP had already seen sharp price swings, including a significant pullback from mid-July highs.

However, the existence of a large, structured deal tied to Ripple’s vast XRP holdings has several implications for XRP price behavior:

Over the long term, if XRP ETFs continue to attract inflows and Ripple advances its payments network, the token could benefit from a stronger institutional demand base, even if retail sentiment fluctuates.

Regulatory and Risk Takeaways

The Role of Clarity in Crypto Regulation

A key theme in the Bloomberg story is that regulatory clarity unlocks capital. Ripple spent years battling the SEC, but the partial legal win around XRP’s status has transformed the company’s funding options.

Without that ruling, it is hard to imagine Wall Street treating Ripple as a structured bet on a now-clarified digital asset. With it, institutional investors feel safer designing complex financing packages anchored to XRP.

This is an important lesson for the broader crypto industry: clear, consistent rules do not kill innovation; they can actually invite larger pools of capital in a more sustainable way.

Managing Concentration Risk in Token-Heavy Companies

Another takeaway is the importance of concentration risk. Ripple is far from the only company whose value is heavily tied to a native token, but the “90% XRP” figure makes that reality hard to ignore.

In other words, the collaboration between crypto-native firms and traditional finance is moving past the hype stage into a more disciplined, risk-aware era.

What This Means for Everyday XRP Holders

Confidence Boost, Not a Guaranteed Moonshot

For everyday XRP holders, the Ripple funding round is a confidence signal, but not a guarantee of outsized returns. It shows that:

However, retail investors do not enjoy the same 10%–25% safety net built into these structured deals. They are fully exposed to XRP price volatility, macro shocks, and any future regulatory shifts.

That is why risk management — position sizing, diversification, and a clear time horizon — remains essential for anyone trading or holding XRP.

Watching the Interplay of ETFs, Treasury, and Market Liquidity

FAQs

Q; Why did Wall Street see Ripple as “90% XRP”?

Investors analyzed Ripple’s balance sheet and concluded that most of its net asset value came from its massive XRP holdings and economic exposure to the token. Because Ripple holds tens of billions of dollars’ worth of XRP in its treasury and escrow, the company’s fortunes largely move with the XRP price, even though the two are legally separate.

Q;  What is the $500M safety net that Bloomberg reported?

The safety net refers to the downside protections negotiated by investors. These include rights to sell their shares back to Ripple after several years with a guaranteed annualized return, potentially higher returns if Ripple forces a buyback, and liquidation preference over existing shareholders. Together, these features create a synthetic floor under their investment, limiting losses if XRP or Ripple underperform.

Q; How does this deal affect the XRP price?

Indirectly, the deal can be seen as bullish for XRP because it shows that large institutional investors are willing to underwrite long-term exposure to the ecosystem. It strengthens Ripple’s capital position and supports confidence around XRP’s role in cross-border payments and ETFs. However, XRP remains a volatile asset, and its price will still be driven by market cycles, liquidity, regulatory developments and broader crypto sentiment.

Q; What role did the SEC case play in attracting investors?

The resolution of Ripple’s high-profile SEC lawsuit helped clarify that XRP, in many common trading contexts, is not considered a security. This regulatory clarity made it easier for Wall Street firms, ETF issuers and other institutions to treat XRP as an investable digital asset without as much legal overhang. That in turn made a large, structured equity deal tied to Ripple’s XRP exposure more palatable.

Q; Should retail investors expect similar protections when buying XRP?

No. Retail investors who buy XRP on exchanges or via ETFs do not benefit from the custom safety nets negotiated in Ripple’s private funding round. They do not have guaranteed returns, put-style rights, or liquidation preference. Retail participants are fully exposed to market volatility and should approach XRP with a clear risk-management strategy, diversified portfolio, and long-term view, rather than expecting institutional-style protections.

See more;China’s rare earth export controls tighten global tech grip